10
Question 1
Councillor A. Stafford asked the portfolio holder for Transport, Environment & Leisure
“How much is the Council currently spending on the fly tipping service and can you provide the amount for each of the last 5 financial years?”
Councillor Mahfouz responded
As the councillor will be aware, fly-tipping has increased across London and the country over recent years and in particular in recent months. As confirmed when I met my west London counterparts and discussed the issue.
The costs are as follows:
2011-12
|
|
£67,102
|
2012-13
|
|
£146,451
|
2013-14
|
|
£171,723
|
2014-15
|
|
£186,755
|
2015-16
|
|
£205,235
|
April-August 2016 £129,095
As he will be aware, this administration, through the changes we brought about last year working with Kingdom Securities, has a partnership that now fines residents who litter, but also issuing FPNs to those who fly-tip in our borough.
That partnership was opposed by members on the Tory benches in this council when we first introduced it.
The difference between the Tories and Labour is clear on this. Whilst the Tories encourage people to fly-tip in our borough and talk it down; we have put the resources to tackle the issue – resources that other London boroughs look at us with envy and want to follow suit.
In the first few weeks of the fly-tip enforcement crews being on the road, over 1,000 FPNs will be dropping onto the doormats. Under a Tory administration, we would have seen an increase in fly-tipping but no action.
The value of fixed penalty notices is likely to exceed £150k
The clear message to those who wish to fly-tip on our streets is: we will find you and we will fine you!
Councillors A. Stafford and R. Wall asked supplementary questions.
Question 2
Councillor Nagpal asked the portfolio holder for Children and Young People
“Does the portfolio holder agree that the results of recent Ofsted inspection of Ealing’s Children’s Services shows that this local authority is quite capable of providing for our young people and does not need divisive and unnecessary Grammar Schools foisted on us by central government?”
Councillor Rai replied
“This Ofsted result puts Ealing in the top 10% nationally, in fact it is the 9th strongest performing children’s services department in the country.
Not only did Ofsted recognise our outcomes for children, including the education of looked-after children, but it also recognised that we have a strong and aspirational leadership for our children’s services of which I am very proud.
The introduction of Grammar Schools is a red herring that we can do without. In fact, in terms of education we have already demonstrated success through the current system with 100% of our high schools and special schools achieving a good or outstanding result.”
Councillors Nagpal and Millican asked supplementary questions.
Question 3
Councillor Theresa Mullins asked the portfolio holder for Transport, Environment & Leisure
Exactly how does less street cleaning lead to cleaner streets?
Councillor Mahfouz replied
One of the issues that people raised with time and time again Cllr Mullins was that too many people put out their black bags too early and/or with food waste in it. This, as she will remember, led to black bags being ripped open and rubbish strewn across our streets.
With the move to wheelie bins, there is obviously an opportunity to move away from that old system to a far cleaner operation.
In fact, we’ve heard tonight how more people, not less, want to have containerised rubbish and recycling.
Where it has worked well, we have seen massive uptake in recycling, in particular of food waste and streets clean of the contents of ripped black bags.
We have put in a trial street cleansing system alongside it to see what is the appropriate level of street cleaning for each street across the borough.
We continue to monitor to ensure that we have the correct frequencies going forward, but what has been evident is that for three quarters of streets – a clean every three weeks is sufficient to maintain acceptable standards.
Councillors Theresa Mullins and Summers asked supplementary questions.
Question 4
Councillor Conlan asked the Leader of the Council
Will the portfolio holder report on progress to develop a cinema on Ealing Broadway?
Councillor Bell replied
Following a four year development relationship between the Council and Land Securities; the ownership of Filmworks and the former Empire cinema site has now transferred to St George.
The Compulsory Purchase Order was approved in 2015 and all land required for the scheme can be acquired. Planning consent has already been secured for the site which will offer 161 new homes, a mixture of restaurants, shops, cafes, a ‘Picture house’ multiscreen cinema, and a landscaped public space. The development will further enhance the retail and entertainment offer in Ealing Town Centre.
St George has already transformed a key area within W5 and their continued dedication to invest in Ealing means we are confident that construction works will commence as scheduled before Christmas 2016, providing jobs, housing and will create an exciting new cultural quarter for the area.
Councillors Conlan and Roz Reece asked supplementary questions.
Question 5
Councillor Conti asked the portfolio holder for Finance & Performance
What average length of time does it take for the Council to respond to emails from residents?
Councillor Johnson replied
The council standard for responding to emails is to acknowledge within 2 working days and respond in full in 10 working days.
For more complex complaints, the aim is to respond within 20 workings days to allow for matters to be fully investigated. There are some complaints and enquiries for which the response times are specified in legislation.
The latest performance (August) figures show that 97% of complaints were responded to within the published standards with the year to date figure being just over 96%.”
It is up to individual services to monitor performance, although this is currently difficult due to constraints in technology.
The council is moving further forward with customers submitting enquiries via e forms which are a more efficient way of dealing with contacts online as they collect the information required to fulfil the service request and are often integrated with council systems enabling immediate transfer of the data required for fulfilment.
With new technology being implemented in the new year there will be an opportunity to monitor and report on a wider range of customer contacts received by the council.
Councillors Conti and Raza asked supplementary questions.
Question 6
Councillor Ball asked the Leader of the Council
“ What will be the total annual business rate revenue from the retail units in Dickens Yard and how much has St George paid so far?”
Answer:
In relation to the ‘total annual business rate revenue from the retail units in Dickens Yard and how much has St George paid so far’ there are two elements to consider (a & b).
- The first are those premises for which St Georges West London Ltd are responsible. The Council has 3 assessments that have been brought in by the Valuation Office Agency as follows:
1) 1st Floor, The Old Fire Station, Dickens Yard. It has a Rateable Value of £12,750. It is currently empty exempt as a listed building status. The annual charge would be £6,336.75 if occupied.
2) Upper Ground Floor, The Old Fire Station, Dickens Yard. It has a Rateable Value of £13,000. The annual charge for 2016-2017 is £3,752.69.
3) Sales & Marketing Suite, 2 New Broadway. It has a Rateable Value of £74,000. The annual charge for 2016/2017 is £38,258.00.
The second part are those premises in Dickens Yard for which St George Wet London Ltd are not responsible. There are 2 assessments that have been brought in by the Valuation Office Agency as follows:
1) Charlotte's W5, Unit 1, Dickens Yard, Longfield Avenue, London, W5 2TD. Rateable Value £203,000 (restaurant)
2) 2 Dickens Yard, Longfield Avenue, London, W5 2TD. Rateable Value £23,500 (letting agent)
The total rateable value is £326,500.
Councillors Ball and Ahmed-Shaikh asked supplementary questions.
Question 7
Councillor Camadoo asked the portfolio holder for Health and Adult Services
Will the portfolio holder reaffirm Ealing Council’s commitment to Ealing hospital, Charing Cross hospital and the ‘Save our Hospitals’ campaign in light of the Sustainability and Transformation Plan?
Councillor Tailor replied
In a word, yes. It is important to stress at this stage that this campaign was in opposition to the SaHF proposals across four hospital sites imposing downgrading and closing hospital services, including Ealing and Charing Cross.
Disgracefully we have lost A&E units at both Central Middlesex and Hammersmith hospitals and the government has refused to intervene on the closure both the maternity and childrens’ units at Ealing hostpital.
In the months ahead we will see A&E units continue to mount as we approach the winter. Northwick Park already cannot cope due to the closure of the other hospital services.
This Council remains opposed to the loss of services without adequate replacements in place.
Councillors Camadoo and Joy Morrissey asked supplementary questions.